Skip to content
Request a demonstration

Global Compliance · Expanded Global Compliance

Audit Readiness and Evidence Completeness

Connect each obligation to its controls, evidence, owner and effectiveness, show which artifacts are missing, and produce an evidence-backed preparation and gap report.

Demonstration: Halden Hospitals Group (fictional) · Healthcare. Fictional data and a scripted answer.

The situation

Organisation
Halden Hospitals Group (fictional)
Who is asking
Head of quality and compliance
Industry
Healthcare
What happened
An external accreditation audit is set for a date, and the team wants to know whether the evidence gaps will be closed in time.

The question asked

At the current pace of closing evidence gaps, will we be ready for the audit date?

What it reads, and who can see the result

  • Evidence tracker registerOutstanding evidence items.
  • Closure history exportItems closed per week.
Reads
Counts of outstanding and closed evidence items by week.
Does not read
The evidence itself or any patient information.
Permission
Quality team's tracker access.
Who sees it
The head of quality and the hospital directors.

Try it

Change the assumptions. Every result and the answer below are recomputed from them, and a warning appears when a result crosses a stated limit.

Assumptions you can change
7
6
2Gaps discovered as evidence is gathered.
Net items closed per week
5
Net closed by the audit
30
Items still open at the audit
22From 52 outstanding today.
Net weekly pace needed to finish
9
Readiness at the audit
89.7%Of 214 evidence items in total.

At this pace items will still be open on the audit date. Raise the pace, find more help, or agree with the auditor which items matter most.

The answer

Simulated answer. Written for this fictional case, not produced by a live model. Only the figures in it are computed, from what you decided above.

At 7 a week, 22 items are still open at the audit; readiness 89.7%.

Of 52 outstanding items [S1], the team closes 7 a week but finds 2 new gaps as it goes, a net of 5 [S2]. Over 6 weeks that is 30 items; to finish, the net pace must be 9 a week.

New gaps found while gathering evidence are the number most often left out of such plans, and the one that decides whether the date is met.

Relies on: S1 · Evidence tracker, todayS2 · Weekly closure history

No approval is needed for this result: it is read-only insight, and nothing consequential happens because of it.

What it produces

chart

Readiness at the audit date

  • Open at audit: 22 · Readiness 89.7% · Needed net pace 9 a week.
recommendation

To protect the date

  • Prioritise items the auditor sampled last time.
  • Track gaps found, not only items closed.

Limits of this example

  • A linear pace; real closure is lumpy and harder near the end.
  • Treats all items as equal effort.
  • This is a scripted demonstration on fictional data. No model was called and no real organisation, person or result is shown.