Skip to content
Request a demonstration

Global Compliance · Expanded Global Compliance

Cross-Border Compliance Mapping

Map obligations across countries, states, regions and local jurisdictions, including overlapping or conflicting requirements and uncertainty about which applies.

Demonstration: Osterley Components GmbH (fictional) · Industrial manufacturing. Fictional data and a scripted answer.

The situation

Organisation
Osterley Components GmbH (fictional)
Who is asking
Data protection officer
Industry
Industrial manufacturing
What happened
A change in one country's rules on transferring personal data may affect flows the company set up years ago.

The question asked

If the transfer mechanism for one country stops being valid, which of our data flows and services are affected?

What it reads, and who can see the result

  • Data flow map registerFlows of personal data between countries and systems.
  • Transfer mechanism register registerWhat lets each flow happen.
Reads
The data flow map and the register of transfer mechanisms.
Does not read
The personal data itself.
Permission
Data protection office access.
Who sees it
The data protection officer, IT and the business owners.

Try it

Fail one or more items and see what stops and what only degrades, worked out by following the dependencies.

Choose what loses its transfer mechanism. Hard dependencies stop with it; soft ones carry on, degraded.

  • Standard clauses, signed.
  • Adequacy decision.
  • Employee pay data.Depends on: Mechanism: Region A to Country X (hard)
  • Customer contacts.Depends on: Mechanism: Region A to Country Y (hard), Mechanism: Region A to Country X (soft)
  • Customer tickets.Depends on: Mechanism: Region A to Country X (hard)
  • Needs the HR system.Depends on: HR payroll system (Country X) (hard)
  • Needs the CRM.Depends on: CRM (Country Y) (hard)
  • Uses the support desk.Depends on: Support desk (Country X) (soft)
loses its transfer mechanism
0
Stops as a result
0
Degraded
0
Unaffected
8

The answer

Simulated answer. Written for this fictional case, not produced by a live model. Only the figures in it are computed, from what you decided above.

If none: 0 item(s) stop and 0 degrade.

Following the data flows, losing none stops none and degrades none [S1][S2]. The most consequential single mechanism in this map is Mechanism: Region A to Country X, which stops 3 other item(s).

A flow with no lawful route has to stop or be re-papered, and the order matters: payroll is dated, marketing analytics is not. The map shows which dependencies force a deadline.

Relies on: S1 · Data flow mapS2 · Transfer mechanism register

Review and approval

The data protection officer decides. Approving fixes the contingency priorities for transfer mechanisms. It does not stop any flow or sign any clause.

Not ready to approve. Fail at least one item first, to see what depends on it.

In the product this is a different person with the right permission. Here you play that role to see the rule.

What it produces

registerDraft, not approved

Contingency priorities

  • Most critical mechanism: Mechanism: Region A to Country X (stops 3 items).
  • For the scenario: none stops none.

Limits of this example

  • Only recorded flows are mapped; an undocumented flow would be missed.
  • The legal validity of a mechanism is for counsel; this shows the consequence of a loss.
  • This is a scripted demonstration on fictional data. No model was called and no real organisation, person or result is shown.