Skip to content
Request a demonstration

Financial Intelligence · Expanded Financial Intelligence

Financial Scenario and Sensitivity Modeling

Model pricing, hiring, investment, expansion, cost-reduction and operating scenarios with explicit variables and assumptions kept distinct from facts.

Demonstration: Osterley Components GmbH (fictional) · Industrial manufacturing. Fictional data and a scripted answer.

The situation

Organisation
Osterley Components GmbH (fictional)
Who is asking
Chief financial officer
Industry
Industrial manufacturing
What happened
The bank covenant requires EBITDA of at least 5.5 million, and the budget assumes a price rise that the sales team doubts.

The question asked

How much room do we have against the covenant if price, volume and costs do not go as planned?

What it reads, and who can see the result

  • Budget P&L exportRevenue, variable and fixed costs.
  • Covenant terms documentThe EBITDA test and its definition.
Reads
The budget P&L lines and the covenant definition.
Does not read
Customer-level data, or any bank account.
Permission
Finance planning read access.
Who sees it
The CFO and the board audit committee.

Try it

Change the assumptions. Every result and the answer below are recomputed from them, and a warning appears when a result crosses a stated limit.

Assumptions you can change
3%
-4%
5%
2%
Revenue
EUR 49,440,000Base 50,000,000.
Variable costs
EUR 31,248,000Base 31,000,000 (62% of revenue).
Fixed costs
EUR 12,240,000Base 12,000,000.
EBITDA
EUR 5,952,000Base 7,000,000.
Change from base
-EUR 1,048,000
Headroom over the covenant
EUR 452,000

The answer

Simulated answer. Written for this fictional case, not produced by a live model. Only the figures in it are computed, from what you decided above.

In this scenario EBITDA is EUR 5,952,000; headroom against the covenant level is EUR 452,000.

Against a base of 7,000,000 the scenario changes EBITDA by -EUR 1,048,000 [S1]. The covenant requires 5,500,000 [S2]. Price and cost inflation move the answer more than a small volume change, because price drops straight through to profit while volume also moves the costs that scale with it.

Use the sliders to find the combination that breaches the covenant, and judge whether that combination is realistic, not just possible.

Relies on: S1 · Budget P&L, base caseS2 · Facility agreement, financial covenant

No approval is needed for this result: it is read-only insight, and nothing consequential happens because of it.

What it produces

chart

EBITDA bridge

  • Base 7,000,000 → scenario EUR 5,952,000 (change -EUR 1,048,000); covenant 5,500,000; headroom EUR 452,000.
recommendation

What to monitor

  • Track realised price against budget monthly.
  • Open the covenant conversation early if headroom falls near zero.

Limits of this example

  • A simple driver model: it does not model the timing of price changes or hedges.
  • The covenant definition of EBITDA is applied as summarised; the agreement governs.
  • This is a scripted demonstration on fictional data. No model was called and no real organisation, person or result is shown.