Skip to content
Request a demonstration

Legal Intelligence

Legal Cost and Outside Counsel Management

Matters, budgets, invoices, law-firm engagements, billing review and legal spending intelligence.

Demonstration: Quillfeather Retail Group (fictional) · Retail. Fictional data and a scripted answer.

The situation

Organisation
Quillfeather Retail Group (fictional)
Who is asking
Head of legal operations
Industry
Retail
What happened
Outside counsel's quarterly invoices have grown faster than the matters, and the engagement letters set rates and billing rules.

The question asked

Which lines in this quarter's legal invoices break the engagement terms?

What it reads, and who can see the result

  • Outside counsel invoices exportTime entries with timekeeper, hours and rate.
  • Engagement letters documentAgreed rates and billing guidelines.
Reads
Invoice lines and the agreed rate cards and billing guidelines.
Does not read
The narrative description of privileged work beyond what the invoice shows.
Permission
Legal operations' matter-management access.
Who sees it
Legal operations and the general counsel.

Try it

Review each flagged record: confirm it or dismiss it. The totals and the answer below follow your decisions.

Time entryTimekeeperHours at rateAmount in question (GBP)FindingDecision
Review of leaseAssociate3.0 h at 2800MatchedNone needed
Draft letter of claimPartner2.5 h at 640900Partner rate for a task the engagement letter assigns to an associate (difference to the associate rate)
Telephone, clientAssociate0.2 h at 2800MatchedNone needed
Research, various mattersAssociate6.5 h at 2801,820Block billing: several tasks in one entry, which the guidelines forbid
Attend hearingPartner4.0 h at 6400MatchedNone needed
Draft letter of claimAssociate2.5 h at 280700Duplicate of the partner's entry for the same letter
TravelPartner3.0 h at 640960Travel time billed at full rate; the guidelines allow half
Flagged
4 of 7 · GBP 4,380
Query with the firm
0 · GBP 0
Accept
0 · GBP 0
Undecided
4 · GBP 4,380

The answer

Simulated answer. Written for this fictional case, not produced by a live model. Only the figures in it are computed, from what you decided above.

4 of 7 invoice lines break the engagement terms, GBP 4,380 in question.

Four different terms are involved: the staffing assignment, the ban on block billing, duplicate time for one task and the travel-time rule [S1][S2]. Each is a rule the firm agreed to, so a query is a matter of applying the letter, not of negotiating.

You have chosen to query 0 lines (GBP 0) and accept 0 (GBP 0); 4 are undecided. Accepting is a legitimate choice where the relationship or the matter justifies it.

Relies on: S1 · Invoices, Q3, firm AS2 · Engagement letter and billing guidelines

Review and approval

The head of legal operations decides. Approving prepares a query to the firm for the lines chosen. It does not withhold payment or send anything automatically.

Not ready to approve. 4 flagged lines are still undecided. Confirm or dismiss each one first.

In the product this is a different person with the right permission. Here you play that role to see the rule.

What it produces

reportDraft, not approved

Invoice review, firm A, Q3

  • Queried: 0 lines, GBP 0.
  • Accepted: 0 lines, GBP 0.

Limits of this example

  • Reading only the invoice and engagement letter: a later agreement by email would not be seen.
  • The review does not judge the quality or necessity of the work.
  • This is a scripted demonstration on fictional data. No model was called and no real organisation, person or result is shown.