Authorised scope
- 0 sources, 0 records.
- 2 restricted sources excluded.
Executive Intelligence · Executive Agents and Action Orchestration
A structured investigation across modules within the requester's own permissions.
Demonstration: Quillfeather Retail Group (fictional) · Retail. Fictional data and a scripted answer.
Which data across departments may the investigation agent read to look into the stock losses, and which stays off limits?
Choose what the platform may read. Restricted material cannot be put in scope here, and a classification the analysis is unsure of must be verified by a person.
| Read it? | Source | Holds | Sensitivity | What the analysis thinks it is |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stock counts and adjustments Inventory system | 480,000 records | internal | Stock movements by store clear | |
| Till exceptions and voids Point of sale | 215,000 records | internal | Till events clear | |
| Delivery receipts Logistics system | 96,000 records | internal | Goods received check | |
| CCTV footage index Security system | 41,000 records | restricted | Camera events (identifies people) clear | |
| Staff rotas and pay HR system | 33,000 records | restricted | Personal employment data clear | |
| Store manager notes Shared notes | 7,200 records | internal | Free-text notes check |
Simulated answer. Written for this fictional case, not produced by a live model. Only the figures in it are computed, from what you decided above.
The agent can look across stock, tills and deliveries to find where the losses concentrate [S1][S2]. CCTV and personnel data are restricted and cannot be brought in here: if they become relevant, the owners decide, through their own process.
Two classifications are uncertain, and free-text notes can hold personal remarks, so a person must verify them: 0 included source(s) still need that. The agent reports patterns for a person to follow up; it does not accuse anyone.
Relies on: S1 · Cross-department data inventoryS2 · Investigation terms of reference
The chief financial officer with internal audit decides. Approving authorises the agent to read the sources in scope. It does not authorise any action against any person.
Not ready to approve. Choose at least one source to read first.
In the product this is a different person with the right permission. Here you play that role to see the rule.
The Executive Intelligence story · This capability in the full register