Skip to content
Request a demonstration

Executive Intelligence · Workforce and Leadership

Organizational Skills Intelligence

Skills coverage from verified training completions and practical checks, showing where no verified coverage exists.

Demonstration: Pellam Diagnostics Ltd (fictional) · Medical devices. Fictional data and a scripted answer.

The situation

Organisation
Pellam Diagnostics Ltd (fictional)
Who is asking
Head of talent
Industry
Medical devices
What happened
A new product line needs skills the company may not have, and the head of talent must see where the gaps are before deciding between hiring and training.

The question asked

Where are our skills gaps against what the next two years require?

What it reads, and who can see the result

  • Skills inventory (aggregated) exportPeople by skill and level.
  • Skills demand plan documentWhat the strategy needs.
Reads
Aggregated counts by skill and level.
Does not read
Individuals' names or assessments.
Permission
Talent analytics aggregate access.
Who sees it
The head of talent and the department heads.

Try it

Review each flagged record: confirm it or dismiss it. The totals and the answer below follow your decisions.

SkillHaveNeed in two yearsShortfall (full-time equivalents)FindingDecision
Mechanical design34340MatchedNone needed
Embedded software11198Eight short; scarce in the market
Regulatory affairs9101One short; a single resignation would double it
Clinical evaluation660MatchedNone needed
Data science495Five short; no internal pipeline
Quality systems15140MatchedNone needed
Flagged
3 of 6 · 14
Close the gap
0 · 0
Tolerable
0 · 0
Undecided
3 · 14

The answer

Simulated answer. Written for this fictional case, not produced by a live model. Only the figures in it are computed, from what you decided above.

3 of 6 skills fall short of the two-year need, by 14 full-time equivalents in all.

The gaps are in the newest skills, where the company has the least and the market is tightest [S1][S2]. Regulatory affairs looks small but is fragile: one resignation doubles the gap.

You have chosen to close 0 gaps (0 full-time equivalents) and treat 0 as tolerable; 3 are undecided. Closing a gap is a choice between hiring, training and buying the capability in.

Relies on: S1 · Skills inventory, aggregatedS2 · Two-year skills demand plan

Review and approval

The head of talent decides. Approving takes the gaps to be closed into the workforce plan for costing. It does not start recruitment.

Not ready to approve. 3 flagged skills are still undecided. Confirm or dismiss each one first.

In the product this is a different person with the right permission. Here you play that role to see the rule.

What it produces

registerDraft, not approved

Skills gaps to close

  • To close: 0 skills, 0 full-time equivalents.
  • Tolerable: 0 skills.

Limits of this example

  • An inventory is only as current as people's self-reporting.
  • Demand is a plan, and plans change.
  • This is a scripted demonstration on fictional data. No model was called and no real organisation, person or result is shown.